Table of Contents >> Show >> Hide
- Rankings Snapshot (As of Dec. 26, 2025)
- What “Rankings” Really Measure (And Why People Argue About Them)
- The Case for Being Higher Than #16
- The Case for Being Lower Than #16
- Opinion Check: Who’s Driving the Hawks’ Narrative?
- Why Different Outlets Rank the Hawks Differently
- How the Hawks Can Climb the Rankings (Without Needing a Miracle)
- So… What’s the Real Hawks Ranking?
- of Hawks “Experience” (The Stuff Rankings Don’t Measure)
“Hawks rankings” can mean a lot of things: standings, power rankings, efficiency stats, or even that one friend’s
extremely confident take that the team is “one wing defender away” from a parade route. For this article, we’re
talking about the Atlanta Hawkswhere they rank right now, why different outlets see them differently,
and what the numbers (and eyeballs) are really saying.
Spoiler: the Hawks are one of the NBA’s most “your mileage may vary” teams this season. Some rankings see a
frisky mid-tier group with real upside. Others see a team that can score 150 and still make you stress-sweep your
living room. Both can be true in the same week. Sometimes the same game.
Rankings Snapshot (As of Dec. 26, 2025)
Before opinions start flying like a Trae lob, here’s the quick “where they stand” view. Rankings update on different
schedules, so consider this the “current vibe check” with the most recently published numbers.
| Ranking Type | Where the Hawks Land | Why It Matters |
|---|---|---|
| Eastern Conference Standings | 9th (15–16) | That’s play-in territoryclose enough to climb, close enough to slip. |
| NBA.com Power Rankings | #16 (updated Dec. 23, 2025) | A “middle of the league” grade, with a warning label about December defense. |
| ESPN Power Rankings | #16 (published Dec. 17, 2025) | Similar tier placement, but focused on availability and frontcourt depth. |
| CBS Sports Power Rankings | #13 (published Dec. 17, 2025) | More optimistic, but still watching how stars fit and whether defense holds. |
If you’re wondering why one list has Atlanta at 13 while another sits them at 16, welcome to the entire point of
this article: rankings are a mirror of what the rater values. Some weigh recent performance heavily.
Some try to forecast. Some split the difference and call it “tiering” so nobody throws a remote.
What “Rankings” Really Measure (And Why People Argue About Them)
1) Standings: The Coldest Ranking of All
Standings are the most honest ranking because they don’t care about your context, your vibes, or your “but we were
missing three rotation guys.” At 15–16 and 9th in the East, the Hawks are hanging in the play-in mix. The gap above
them isn’t a canyon, but it’s not a speed bump eitherAtlanta’s season is still one strong stretch (or one rough
injury week) away from looking totally different.
2) Power Rankings: The “How Good Are You Right Now?” Conversation
Power rankings are basically a weekly group chat between data and eye test. NBA.com’s Week 10 entry flat-out says
Atlanta slipped back to .500 and points to the defensive issues they’ve had in December, even with Trae Young back.
ESPN’s write-up around mid-December emphasizes frontcourt availability and highlights Jalen Johnson’s star-level
growth. CBS is watching the same movie but reacting to a different scene: the Hawks staying “in the thick of the East”
while tracking how the lineup looks when key pieces return.
3) Efficiency Rankings: The “How You Win/Lose” X-Ray
Efficiency stats tell you if a team’s results are sustainable. A squad that keeps winning close games with shaky
underlying numbers can feel like a magic trick that might run out of rabbits. Meanwhile, a team with solid efficiency
but a mediocre record might be one tactical adjustment away from a run.
In the recent NBA.com power rankings entry, Atlanta’s offensive rating sits in the low-to-mid tier
and their defensive rating is around the league’s middle, resulting in a slightly negative net rating.
Other stat sites paint a similar picture: a respectable offense, a defense that can wobble, and a season that swings on
which version shows up.
The Case for Being Higher Than #16
If you’re the kind of fan who reads power rankings and immediately thinks, “Disrespect,” here’s your evidence file.
There are real reasons some outlets grade the Hawks closer to the low teens.
They Can Put Pressure on Defenses in Multiple Ways
Atlanta isn’t a one-trick offense. Yes, Trae Young changes everything when he’s healthypace, passing angles, late-clock
creativity. But the bigger story this season is how much Jalen Johnson has expanded what the Hawks can do. He’s been
posting star-level box score production (points, rebounds, assists), and the offense can run through him in ways that
make opponents guard different actions: dribble handoffs, short-roll playmaking, and quick-hit transition reads.
That versatility is exactly why the Hawks can look like a top-10 offense on certain nights. It also explains why some
rankings view them as a “dangerous” play-in-level teamnobody loves drawing a squad that can suddenly score in bunches
and win the math battle from three.
Jalen Johnson’s Leap Changes the Ceiling
There’s a difference between “good player” and “the person who makes your whole roster make sense.” Johnson’s growth
pushes Atlanta toward the second category. When he’s creating advantages, the Hawks get cleaner shots, fewer stalled
possessions, and more ways to punish switches.
When national writers talk about Atlanta’s upside, they often orbit around the same idea: if Johnson is legitimately
a near-All-Star-level engine, the Hawks don’t need perfection elsewhere. They just need competence and health.
They Have Real Defensive Personnel (Even If It’s Not Always a Defensive Team)
This is the Hawks paradox: the roster includes defenders who can make life miserable, but the team defense can still
spring leaks. Wings and guards like Dyson Daniels can rack up disruptive playssteals, deflections, blown-up actions.
When Atlanta’s effort is sharp, you can see the outline of a tough, pesky group that forces ugly possessions.
That’s why the more optimistic opinions exist at all. If you’ve watched enough Hawks games this season, you’ve seen a
version of their defense that looks organized, physical, and genuinely annoying (the highest compliment in pro sports).
The challenge is consistencyespecially across long road trips and dense schedule stretches.
The Case for Being Lower Than #16
Now the other side of the argumentbecause the Hawks also have a talent for turning a comfortable night into a
two-possession stress test. Sometimes in under three minutes.
December Defense Has Been a Real Problem
NBA.com’s power rankings entry doesn’t sugarcoat it: Atlanta’s December defense has been near the bottom of the league
during that stretch, and opponents have been scoring efficiently. It’s not just “bad luck” defense either. It’s a mix of
transition breakdowns, late rotations, and giving up easy looks when the first action collapses the shell.
The scoreboard tells the story too. The Hawks were involved in extremely high-scoring games against Chicago
including the 152–150 track meet on Dec. 21 and another close loss on Dec. 23. Those games are fun in the way roller
coasters are fun: thrilling, loud, and technically optional.
Home vs. Road Weirdness
One of the stranger notes in NBA.com’s breakdown: Atlanta’s road record has been stronger than their home record.
That’s not unheard of, but it’s unusual enough that it raises questions. Are they playing with more edge on the road?
Are they getting hit with tougher opponents at home? Or is it just a small-sample quirk that will flatten out?
Either way, rankings tend to punish teams that can’t bank home winsbecause that’s usually the easiest way to build
a playoff profile over 82 games.
Availability Keeps Shifting the Evaluation
The Hawks’ season has also been shaped by who’s actually on the floor. ESPN’s power rankings discussion in mid-December
pointed to frontcourt availability issues, and injuries have continued to affect depth pieces as well. Even if you don’t
want to blame injuries for everything (fair), constant lineup disruption makes it harder to build the kind of defensive
consistency that separates “scrappy” from “reliable.”
Opinion Check: Who’s Driving the Hawks’ Narrative?
Hawks opinions usually cluster around a few names. Here’s the “what people are saying” versionwithout pretending
every take is equal (some belong in the recycling bin next to last year’s mock drafts).
Trae Young: The Fit Question (Not the Talent Question)
Nobody debates whether Trae is skilled. The debate is about team identity. NBA.com noted that Young is back
while the Hawks simultaneously slid to .500, and CBS framed the big question as how the Hawks integrate him without
“torpedoing the defense.” That’s the national conversation in one sentence: elite offense vs. defensive stability.
The most reasonable middle ground looks like this: Trae raises Atlanta’s late-game shot quality and overall ceiling,
but the Hawks have to commit to lineups and habits that protect the defense behind him. That’s not a Trae-only job.
That’s a roster-wide “we all rotate on time” job.
Jalen Johnson: The Do-Everything Connector
If you want the fastest way to understand why Hawks rankings bounce, watch what happens when Johnson is cooking.
When he’s pushing the pace, punishing mismatches, and making the extra pass, Atlanta looks like a team that can
punch above its seed. Stat pages back it up: he’s leading the team in scoring and rebounding, and his assist numbers
are big enough to make casual fans blink and check if the site accidentally labeled him a point guard.
Dyson Daniels: The “Defense Is a Skill” Reminder
Daniels is a big reason people keep believing the Hawks can be better defensively than their rough stretches suggest.
He’s been near the top of the team in steals, and he gives Atlanta a tone-setter who can make opposing ballhandlers
work for air. When the Hawks defend well, it often starts with guard pressure and active handsexactly the stuff that
doesn’t show up fully in highlights but absolutely changes possessions.
The Supporting Cast: The Swing Vote
Power rankings rarely hinge on your stars (everyone has stars). They hinge on the “Monday night in January” guys:
the shooters who have to hit open threes, the bigs who have to rebound, the bench unit that can’t give up a 12–2 run
in two minutes.
On paper, Atlanta has the ingredients for competent depthshooting, switchable wings, and enough ballhandling to survive
non-Trae minutes. But as the NBA.com entry points out, the Hawks have had stretches with rough starts, poor defensive
results, and a tendency to give opponents efficient looks. When the supporting cast defends and hits shots, the Hawks
look ranked too low. When they don’t, the Hawks look exactly where the rankings place them.
Why Different Outlets Rank the Hawks Differently
Some Are Reacting to the Recent Slide
NBA.com’s Week 10 write-up emphasizes a three-game losing streak and defensive struggles in December. That kind of
“right now” trend tends to pull teams down.
Some Are Pricing in “What They’ll Be When Healthy”
ESPN’s discussion earlier in December reads more like a forward-looking evaluation: if the Hawks can stabilize the
frontcourt rotation and keep building around Johnson’s emergence, their mid-tier ranking comes with an implied “could rise.”
Some Just Like the Underlying Profile More
CBS, placing Atlanta higher in the teens, highlights that the Hawks remain in the mix in the East and frames the
return of key players as a reason the ceiling might be higher than the raw record suggests. That’s basically the
optimistic argument: “they’re not far off, and the roster can be better than this.”
How the Hawks Can Climb the Rankings (Without Needing a Miracle)
1) Make Defense Predictable Again
The Hawks don’t need to become a top-3 defense overnight. But they do need to stop giving up the easiest points:
transition layups, corner threes after late help, and second chances when the possession should’ve ended.
The numbers mentioned in recent power rankings and defensive summaries point to the same idea: when Atlanta’s defense
dips, it dips hard. The path upward is not a gimmickit’s boring consistency: sprint back, communicate, rebound,
rotate on the catch, and don’t gamble unless the back line is set.
2) Keep the Pace… But Choose When to Hit the Gas
Atlanta plays fast, and that’s often good. The problem is that fast can turn into frantic. The best Hawks games are the
ones where they run when the advantage is real, then settle into good half-court possessions instead of launching
“early clock because we’re excited” shots.
3) Win the “Non-Star Minutes”
Every team talks about this like it’s a new discovery, but it matters: if the Hawks can play even basketball when the
stars sit, their record climbs. If those minutes bleed points, the standings stay stuck. This is where coaching,
lineup balance, and shot selection become ranking fuel.
So… What’s the Real Hawks Ranking?
Here’s the most honest answer: the Hawks are a mid-tier team with high-variance outcomes. That’s why
they can be 9th in the East while sitting around 13–16 in power rankings. It’s also why opinions are loud: fans and
analysts can point to real evidence for both optimism and frustration.
If Atlanta tightens the defense back toward “league average but disciplined,” the offense and star production can push
them up the standings quickly. If the defense keeps wobbling and the schedule gets heavier (and it does), they’ll stay
in the play-in cluster where one week of bad shooting can drop you three spots.
The rankings aren’t a verdict. They’re a snapshot. And the Hawks, more than most teams, are always one stretch away
from changing the picture.
of Hawks “Experience” (The Stuff Rankings Don’t Measure)
There’s a special kind of basketball experience that happens when you follow a team that can score like a sports car
but sometimes defends like a shopping cart with one stubborn wheel. If you’ve watched the Hawks this season, you’ve
probably had at least one night where you thought, “This is beautiful basketball,” and another where you whispered,
“Please just get one stop,” like you were negotiating with the universe.
A perfect example is what it feels like to live through a high-scoring Hawks game. You check the score midway through
the third quarter and see both teams flirting with 100, and your brain does that little reset where it tries to remember
if you accidentally turned on an All-Star Game replay. The Hawks can turn a normal Friday into an offensive festival
where every possession feels like a potential highlight. The problem is that it works both waysbecause if you’re not
getting stops, your own great offense becomes a treadmill. You’re running hard, you’re sweating, and somehow you’re still
in the same place.
That’s why close games can feel like a full-body workout. Take the two Bulls games in late December: one turned into a
152–150 scoreboard firework show, and the other was another tight finish. As a viewer, it’s entertaining… and also a
gentle reminder to drink water and unclench your jaw. Your group chat becomes a live documentary: one person panicking,
one person posting memes, one person insisting “we’re fine” while clearly not fine. It’s not just basketball. It’s a
shared emotional event.
Then there are the nights when the Hawks get punched early. Those games are a different kind of experiencethe kind
where you start doing math in your head like, “If we cut it to 10 by halftime…” You watch the team search for traction,
hoping for a defensive burst, a run fueled by energy plays, anything that flips the rhythm. And when it doesn’t happen,
you get the strange quiet of a game that’s drifting away, where every timeout feels like a reset button someone keeps
pressing with no batteries inside.
But here’s the secret: this volatility is also why Hawks wins feel so good. When they lock in defensively, when the
ball is moving, when Trae’s passing opens the floor and Jalen Johnson is attacking mismatches like he owns the idea of
gravity, Atlanta can look like a team nobody wants to deal with in a single-elimination environment. That’s why fans
keep arguing, keep hoping, keep checking the standings after every game. Rankings measure outcomes. The Hawks experience
is about possibilitysometimes frustrating, sometimes thrilling, and rarely boring.
